파트 2 큐 카드
귀하의 국가에 도입하고 싶은 새로운 법률에 대해 설명해주세요.
당신은 이렇게 말해야 합니다:
- 무슨 법이냐
- 이 법이 가져오는 변화
- 이 새로운 법이 인기를 끌지 여부
- 새로운 법을 어떻게 생각해냈나
- 이 새로운 법에 대해 어떻게 생각하시나요?
이 주제에 대해 1~2분 정도 이야기할 시간이 있습니다.
3부 토론 질문
- What rules should students follow at school?
- Do people in your country usually obey the law?
- What kinds of behavior are considered as good behavior?
- Do you think children can learn about the law outside of school?
- What are the benefits for people to obey rules?
- How can parents teach children to obey rules?
말하기 전에 주제를 살펴보세요
이미지를 아이디어 프롬프트로 사용하세요. 발견한 사항을 설명하고 이를 경험과 연결한 다음 실제 질문에 답하세요.


모델 답변을 나란히 들음
더 간단한 답변부터 시작하여 Band를 전환하여 동일한 작업이 어떻게 개발될 수 있는지 듣고 개인 응답을 녹음하세요. 이것은 공식적인 답변이나 점수 보장이 아닌 교육용 예시입니다.
2부 — 모델 답변
Part 2 cue-card response
I'd introduce a law called the 'right to disconnect'. It would stop employers asking staff to reply to work messages outside work hours. The change would give people better time with family and less stress. I think most workers would like it, though some bosses might not. I thought of it because I often get emails late and it feels like you never finish work. I feel it's fair and would help people's mental health, but it would need clear rules so employers can't ignore it.
One law I would introduce is a statutory 'right to disconnect' that prevents employers from expecting employees to deal with non-urgent work communications outside their contracted hours. The law would require employers to set clear off-hours, refrain from sending routine emails or messages at night, and put emergency protocols in place so urgent matters can still be handled. This would bring real changes: better work–life balance, lower stress and clearer boundaries between home and work, and it would force firms to rethink rostering and communication practices. I suspect it would be popular among staff, particularly parents and carers, though some managers and small businesses might resist because they worry about losing flexibility. I arrived at the idea after years of getting late-night emails and seeing colleagues burn out; for instance, a friend missed her child's recital because she had to answer messages. I feel strongly that it would improve mental health and family life, and that clear legal rights would create fairer expectations. For example, France already has rules like this, and introducing penalties or an inspection regime would make the law meaningful rather than symbolic; employers might even be required to log communications to show compliance, which would be intrusive but increase accountability.
3부 - 모델 답변
What rules should students follow at school?
Students should follow basic rules like being on time, listening to teachers, doing homework and being polite to others. Schools often ask pupils to wear a uniform and not use phones in class. These rules help lessons run smoothly and keep everyone safe.
Schools should have clear, reasonable rules that encourage responsibility as well as respect: punctuality, attentiveness, honest work and consideration for others. Practical measures like banning phones during lessons, having a fair behaviour policy and teaching students how to resolve conflicts are useful. For example, a simple rule about lining up calmly prevents accidents at the dining hall and teaches order.
Do people in your country usually obey the law?
People in my country mostly obey the law, especially obvious things like traffic lights and paying taxes. But some people break rules if they think they won't get caught, such as parking illegally or speeding. It often depends on the person and the situation.
Overall people tend to obey laws that are visible and well‑enforced, like traffic regulations, but there is a grey area where social norms matter more than formal rules. Compliance varies with trust in institutions, the chance of being caught and cultural attitudes; for instance, minor offences such as littering or jaywalking are common if enforcement is lax. Effective policing and fair penalties usually increase obedience.
What kinds of behavior are considered as good behavior?
Good behaviour includes being polite, helping others, telling the truth and following rules. People also think giving up a seat for an older person or saying sorry are good actions. These things make society nicer.
Good behaviour covers respect, empathy and reliability: listening to others, keeping promises, showing courtesy in public and helping those in need. Small acts like giving up a bus seat, queuing properly or volunteering locally signal civic-minded behaviour. Such actions build trust and make daily life smoother for everyone.
Do you think children can learn about the law outside of school?
Yes. Children learn about rules from parents, TV and friends. They copy behaviour they see at home, and neighbours or community events can teach them about right and wrong too.
Definitely. Children absorb a lot outside school: parents, family routines and community groups are powerful teachers. Practical experiences — such as participating in local councils for young people, mock trials or community service — help them understand laws and consequences. Media and age-appropriate online resources can also explain rights and responsibilities in a relatable way.
What are the benefits for people to obey rules?
If people obey rules, life is safer and fairer. There are fewer accidents and less arguing. It also helps everyone know what to expect, so things run smoothly.
Obeying rules brings predictability and trust, which underpin social and economic life: roads are safer, public services work better and transactions require less policing. It also reduces costs associated with crime and conflict, and fosters a sense of fairness. For example, reliable adherence to traffic laws significantly cuts accidents and emergency costs.
How can parents teach children to obey rules?
Parents can teach rules by setting a good example, telling children the reasons for rules, and using routines and praise. Simple things like bedtime and chores teach discipline.
Parents teach rule-following best by modelling behaviour and by being consistent: explaining reasons, setting clear boundaries and enforcing fair consequences. Techniques like family meetings to agree household rules, chore charts, and natural consequences (for instance, if you miss a bus you learn punctuality the hard way) help children internalise norms. Positive reinforcement and explaining the wider purpose of rules are more effective than harsh punishment.
답변 방법 귀하의 국가에 도입하고 싶은 새로운 법률을 설명하십시오. IELTS 말하기 질문
국가 큐 카드에 도입하고 싶은 새로운 법률을 설명하십시오. 준비 시간을 사용하여 강연을 통한 경로를 구축하십시오. 명확한 주제를 선택하고 두 가지 구체적인 순간이나 세부 사항을 추가한 후 그것이 중요한 이유를 설명하여 마무리하세요. 그런 다음 연결된 파트 3 질문을 사용하여 더 폭넓은 설명과 비교를 연습하세요.
큐 카드 프롬프트:
- 무슨 법이냐
- 이 법이 가져오는 변화
- 이 새로운 법이 인기를 끌지 여부
- 새로운 법을 어떻게 생각해냈나
- 이 새로운 법에 대해 어떻게 생각하시나요?
- 열기: 사람, 장소, 사물 또는 사건을 식별합니다.
- 개발: 두 가지 세부 사항이나 순간을 논리적 순서로 설명합니다.
- 확장: 이유, 결과, 비교 또는 문제를 설명합니다.
- 묵상: 주제가 기억에 남거나 중요한 이유를 설명하여 마무리합니다.
질문별 접근 방식
| 연습문제 | 유용한 답변 이동 |
|---|---|
| What rules should students follow at school? | 먼저 사물의 이름을 지정한 다음 구체적인 특징이나 예를 설명하세요. |
| Do people in your country usually obey the law? | 대본을 외우지 않고 직접 답변하고 이유 하나와 간단한 예를 들어보세요. |
| What kinds of behavior are considered as good behavior? | 먼저 사물의 이름을 지정한 다음 구체적인 특징이나 예를 설명하세요. |
| Do you think children can learn about the law outside of school? | 가능한 견해를 기술하고 이유를 설명하고 하나의 조건이나 예를 추가하십시오. |
어휘 집중
모델 답변에서 이미 입증된 유용한 언어에는 자신의 답변에서 정확한 단어를 사용하는 것이 포함됩니다. 의미와 자연스러운 단어 파트너십을 배운 다음 전체 스크립트를 복사하는 대신 각 항목을 다른 답변에 사용하십시오.
피해야 할 일반적인 실수
- 질문에 부분적으로만 대답하는 암기된 답변을 제공합니다.
- 의미나 배열을 확인하지 않고 어려운 어휘를 추가합니다.
- 잠시 수정하고 계속하는 대신 오류가 발생할 때마다 다시 시작합니다.
- 첫 번째 시도를 기록하기 전에 모범 답변을 읽어보세요.
귀하의 국가 실무에 도입하고 싶은 새로운 법률에 대해 설명하십시오. FAQ
귀하의 국가 큐카드 준비 시간에 도입하고 싶은 새로운 법률 설명을 어떻게 활용해야 합니까?
오프닝, 두세 가지 세부 사항 및 최종 반영을 위한 키워드를 작성하세요. 완전한 문장을 쓰려고 하지 마세요.
큐카드 총알을 모두 가려야 하나요?
프롬프트는 대화를 정리하는 데 도움이 됩니다. 이를 덮는 것이 유용하지만 각 라인을 기계적으로 체크하는 것보다 일관된 1~2분 응답이 더 중요합니다.
파트 3 질문은 파트 2와 어떻게 연결되어 있나요?
이유, 비교, 사회적 영향 또는 미래 가능성을 통해 동일한 광범위한 주제를 전개하므로 답변에는 일반적으로 파트 1보다 더 많은 설명이 필요합니다.