パート 2 キューカード
あなたの国に導入したい新しい法律について説明してください
次のように言うべきです。
- それはどんな法律ですか
- この法律がもたらす変化
- この新しい法律は普及するかどうか
- 新しい法律をどうやって思いついたのか
- この新しい法律についてどう思いますか
このトピックについて話す時間は 1 ~ 2 分です。
パート 3 ディスカッションの質問
- What rules should students follow at school?
- Do people in your country usually obey the law?
- What kinds of behavior are considered as good behavior?
- Do you think children can learn about the law outside of school?
- What are the benefits for people to obey rules?
- How can parents teach children to obey rules?
話す前にトピックを確認する
画像をアイデアのヒントとして使用します。気づいたことを説明し、それを自分の経験に結び付けてから、本当の質問に答えてください。


模範解答を並べて聞く
より単純な答えから始めて、Band を切り替えて、同じタスクをどのように開発できるかを聞き、それから個人的な応答を記録します。これらは指導例であり、正式な解答やスコアの保証ではありません。
パート 2 — 模範解答
Part 2 cue-card response
I'd introduce a law called the 'right to disconnect'. It would stop employers asking staff to reply to work messages outside work hours. The change would give people better time with family and less stress. I think most workers would like it, though some bosses might not. I thought of it because I often get emails late and it feels like you never finish work. I feel it's fair and would help people's mental health, but it would need clear rules so employers can't ignore it.
One law I would introduce is a statutory 'right to disconnect' that prevents employers from expecting employees to deal with non-urgent work communications outside their contracted hours. The law would require employers to set clear off-hours, refrain from sending routine emails or messages at night, and put emergency protocols in place so urgent matters can still be handled. This would bring real changes: better work–life balance, lower stress and clearer boundaries between home and work, and it would force firms to rethink rostering and communication practices. I suspect it would be popular among staff, particularly parents and carers, though some managers and small businesses might resist because they worry about losing flexibility. I arrived at the idea after years of getting late-night emails and seeing colleagues burn out; for instance, a friend missed her child's recital because she had to answer messages. I feel strongly that it would improve mental health and family life, and that clear legal rights would create fairer expectations. For example, France already has rules like this, and introducing penalties or an inspection regime would make the law meaningful rather than symbolic; employers might even be required to log communications to show compliance, which would be intrusive but increase accountability.
パート 3 — 模範解答
What rules should students follow at school?
Students should follow basic rules like being on time, listening to teachers, doing homework and being polite to others. Schools often ask pupils to wear a uniform and not use phones in class. These rules help lessons run smoothly and keep everyone safe.
Schools should have clear, reasonable rules that encourage responsibility as well as respect: punctuality, attentiveness, honest work and consideration for others. Practical measures like banning phones during lessons, having a fair behaviour policy and teaching students how to resolve conflicts are useful. For example, a simple rule about lining up calmly prevents accidents at the dining hall and teaches order.
Do people in your country usually obey the law?
People in my country mostly obey the law, especially obvious things like traffic lights and paying taxes. But some people break rules if they think they won't get caught, such as parking illegally or speeding. It often depends on the person and the situation.
Overall people tend to obey laws that are visible and well‑enforced, like traffic regulations, but there is a grey area where social norms matter more than formal rules. Compliance varies with trust in institutions, the chance of being caught and cultural attitudes; for instance, minor offences such as littering or jaywalking are common if enforcement is lax. Effective policing and fair penalties usually increase obedience.
What kinds of behavior are considered as good behavior?
Good behaviour includes being polite, helping others, telling the truth and following rules. People also think giving up a seat for an older person or saying sorry are good actions. These things make society nicer.
Good behaviour covers respect, empathy and reliability: listening to others, keeping promises, showing courtesy in public and helping those in need. Small acts like giving up a bus seat, queuing properly or volunteering locally signal civic-minded behaviour. Such actions build trust and make daily life smoother for everyone.
Do you think children can learn about the law outside of school?
Yes. Children learn about rules from parents, TV and friends. They copy behaviour they see at home, and neighbours or community events can teach them about right and wrong too.
Definitely. Children absorb a lot outside school: parents, family routines and community groups are powerful teachers. Practical experiences — such as participating in local councils for young people, mock trials or community service — help them understand laws and consequences. Media and age-appropriate online resources can also explain rights and responsibilities in a relatable way.
What are the benefits for people to obey rules?
If people obey rules, life is safer and fairer. There are fewer accidents and less arguing. It also helps everyone know what to expect, so things run smoothly.
Obeying rules brings predictability and trust, which underpin social and economic life: roads are safer, public services work better and transactions require less policing. It also reduces costs associated with crime and conflict, and fosters a sense of fairness. For example, reliable adherence to traffic laws significantly cuts accidents and emergency costs.
How can parents teach children to obey rules?
Parents can teach rules by setting a good example, telling children the reasons for rules, and using routines and praise. Simple things like bedtime and chores teach discipline.
Parents teach rule-following best by modelling behaviour and by being consistent: explaining reasons, setting clear boundaries and enforcing fair consequences. Techniques like family meetings to agree household rules, chore charts, and natural consequences (for instance, if you miss a bus you learn punctuality the hard way) help children internalise norms. Positive reinforcement and explaining the wider purpose of rules are more effective than harsh punishment.
答え方 あなたの国に導入したい新しい法律について説明してください IELTS スピーキング問題
「あなたの国に導入したい新しい法律について説明してください」というキューカードの場合は、準備議事録を使用して話の流れを構築します。明確な主題を選択し、2 つの具体的な瞬間または詳細を追加し、それが重要な理由で終わります。次に、リンクされたパート 3 の質問を使用して、より広範な説明と比較を練習します。
キューカードのプロンプト:
- それはどんな法律ですか
- この法律がもたらす変化
- この新しい法律は普及するかどうか
- 新しい法律をどうやって思いついたのか
- この新しい法律についてどう思いますか
- オープニング: 人、場所、物体、または出来事を特定します。
- 開発: 2 つの詳細または瞬間を論理的な順序で説明します。
- 拡張: 理由、結果、比較、または問題を説明します。
- 振り返り: その主題がなぜ記憶に残るのか、または重要なのかを最後に述べます。
質問ごとのアプローチ
| 練習問題 | 役に立つ答えの動き |
|---|---|
| What rules should students follow at school? | まず物に名前を付けてから、具体的な機能や例を説明します。 |
| Do people in your country usually obey the law? | スクリプトを暗記せずに、直接的な答え、理由を 1 つ、短い例を述べてください。 |
| What kinds of behavior are considered as good behavior? | まず物に名前を付けてから、具体的な機能や例を説明します。 |
| Do you think children can learn about the law outside of school? | 考えられる見解を述べ、その理由を説明し、条件または例を 1 つ追加します。 |
語彙に焦点を当てる
模範解答ですでに示されている有用な言葉には、自分の解答の正確な言葉を使用することが含まれます。意味と自然な単語のパートナーシップを学び、スクリプトを完全にコピーするのではなく、それぞれの項目を別の回答に使用します。
避けるべきよくある間違い
- 質問に対して部分的にしか答えていない、暗記した回答をする。
- 意味やコロケーションを確認せずに、難しい語彙を追加する。
- エラーが発生するたびに、簡単に修正して続行するのではなく、再起動します。
- 自分の最初の解答を記録する前に、模範解答を読んでください。
あなたの国で導入したい新しい法律について説明してください 実務 FAQ
「あなたの国のキューカード準備議事録に導入したい新しい法律について説明してください」をどのように使用すればよいですか?
冒頭、2 つまたは 3 つの詳細、最後の感想のキーワードを書きます。完全な文章を書こうとしないでください。
キューカードのすべての箇条書きをカバーする必要がありますか?
プロンプトはトークを整理するのに役立ちます。それらをカバーすることは有益ですが、機械的に各行をチェックするよりも、1 ~ 2 分間の一貫した応答の方が重要です。
パート 3 の質問はパート 2 にどのように関連していますか?
これらは、理由、比較、社会的影響、将来の可能性を通じて同じ広範なテーマを展開するため、通常、回答にはパート 1 よりも詳しい説明が必要です。