Tarjeta de referencia de la parte 2
Describe una nueva ley que te gustaría introducir en tu país.
Deberías decir:
- que ley es
- Qué cambios trae esta ley
- Si esta nueva ley será popular
- ¿Cómo se te ocurrió la nueva ley?
- ¿Cómo te sientes acerca de esta nueva ley?
Tendrás uno o dos minutos para hablar sobre este tema.
Parte 3 Preguntas de discusión
- What rules should students follow at school?
- Do people in your country usually obey the law?
- What kinds of behavior are considered as good behavior?
- Do you think children can learn about the law outside of school?
- What are the benefits for people to obey rules?
- How can parents teach children to obey rules?
Estado de la práctica: tema archivado de un ciclo anterior del banco de preguntas. Sigue siendo útil para la práctica de habilidades, pero no se presenta como una pregunta de examen actual o garantizada. Cómo se etiquetan los temas.
Lea la transcripción completa
One law I would introduce is a statutory 'right to disconnect' that prevents employers from expecting employees to deal with non-urgent work communications outside their contracted hours. The law would require employers to set clear off-hours, refrain from sending routine emails or messages at night, and put emergency protocols in place so urgent matters can still be handled. This would bring real changes: better work–life balance, lower stress and clearer boundaries between home and work, and it would force firms to rethink rostering and communication practices. I suspect it would be popular among staff, particularly parents and carers, though some managers and small businesses might resist because they worry about losing flexibility. I arrived at the idea after years of getting late-night emails and seeing colleagues burn out; for instance, a friend missed her child's recital because she had to answer messages. I feel strongly that it would improve mental health and family life, and that clear legal rights would create fairer expectations. For example, France already has rules like this, and introducing penalties or an inspection regime would make the law meaningful rather than symbolic; employers might even be required to log communications to show compliance, which would be intrusive but increase accountability.
Vea el tema antes de hablar.
Utilice las imágenes como sugerencias de ideas. Describe lo que notas, conéctalo con tu experiencia y luego responde la pregunta real.
Respuestas modelo, escuchadas una al lado de la otra
Comience con la respuesta más simple, cambie Band para escuchar cómo se puede desarrollar la misma tarea y luego registre una respuesta personal. Estos son ejemplos de enseñanza, no respuestas oficiales ni garantías de puntuación.
Parte 2: Respuesta modelo
Part 2 cue-card response
I'd introduce a law called the 'right to disconnect'. It would stop employers asking staff to reply to work messages outside work hours. The change would give people better time with family and less stress. I think most workers would like it, though some bosses might not. I thought of it because I often get emails late and it feels like you never finish work. I feel it's fair and would help people's mental health, but it would need clear rules so employers can't ignore it.
One law I would introduce is a statutory 'right to disconnect' that prevents employers from expecting employees to deal with non-urgent work communications outside their contracted hours. The law would require employers to set clear off-hours, refrain from sending routine emails or messages at night, and put emergency protocols in place so urgent matters can still be handled. This would bring real changes: better work–life balance, lower stress and clearer boundaries between home and work, and it would force firms to rethink rostering and communication practices. I suspect it would be popular among staff, particularly parents and carers, though some managers and small businesses might resist because they worry about losing flexibility. I arrived at the idea after years of getting late-night emails and seeing colleagues burn out; for instance, a friend missed her child's recital because she had to answer messages. I feel strongly that it would improve mental health and family life, and that clear legal rights would create fairer expectations. For example, France already has rules like this, and introducing penalties or an inspection regime would make the law meaningful rather than symbolic; employers might even be required to log communications to show compliance, which would be intrusive but increase accountability.
Parte 3: Respuestas modelo
What rules should students follow at school?
Students should follow basic rules like being on time, listening to teachers, doing homework and being polite to others. Schools often ask pupils to wear a uniform and not use phones in class. These rules help lessons run smoothly and keep everyone safe.
Schools should have clear, reasonable rules that encourage responsibility as well as respect: punctuality, attentiveness, honest work and consideration for others. Practical measures like banning phones during lessons, having a fair behaviour policy and teaching students how to resolve conflicts are useful. For example, a simple rule about lining up calmly prevents accidents at the dining hall and teaches order.
Do people in your country usually obey the law?
People in my country mostly obey the law, especially obvious things like traffic lights and paying taxes. But some people break rules if they think they won't get caught, such as parking illegally or speeding. It often depends on the person and the situation.
Overall people tend to obey laws that are visible and well‑enforced, like traffic regulations, but there is a grey area where social norms matter more than formal rules. Compliance varies with trust in institutions, the chance of being caught and cultural attitudes; for instance, minor offences such as littering or jaywalking are common if enforcement is lax. Effective policing and fair penalties usually increase obedience.
What kinds of behavior are considered as good behavior?
Good behaviour includes being polite, helping others, telling the truth and following rules. People also think giving up a seat for an older person or saying sorry are good actions. These things make society nicer.
Good behaviour covers respect, empathy and reliability: listening to others, keeping promises, showing courtesy in public and helping those in need. Small acts like giving up a bus seat, queuing properly or volunteering locally signal civic-minded behaviour. Such actions build trust and make daily life smoother for everyone.
Do you think children can learn about the law outside of school?
Yes. Children learn about rules from parents, TV and friends. They copy behaviour they see at home, and neighbours or community events can teach them about right and wrong too.
Definitely. Children absorb a lot outside school: parents, family routines and community groups are powerful teachers. Practical experiences — such as participating in local councils for young people, mock trials or community service — help them understand laws and consequences. Media and age-appropriate online resources can also explain rights and responsibilities in a relatable way.
What are the benefits for people to obey rules?
If people obey rules, life is safer and fairer. There are fewer accidents and less arguing. It also helps everyone know what to expect, so things run smoothly.
Obeying rules brings predictability and trust, which underpin social and economic life: roads are safer, public services work better and transactions require less policing. It also reduces costs associated with crime and conflict, and fosters a sense of fairness. For example, reliable adherence to traffic laws significantly cuts accidents and emergency costs.
How can parents teach children to obey rules?
Parents can teach rules by setting a good example, telling children the reasons for rules, and using routines and praise. Simple things like bedtime and chores teach discipline.
Parents teach rule-following best by modelling behaviour and by being consistent: explaining reasons, setting clear boundaries and enforcing fair consequences. Techniques like family meetings to agree household rules, chore charts, and natural consequences (for instance, if you miss a bus you learn punctuality the hard way) help children internalise norms. Positive reinforcement and explaining the wider purpose of rules are more effective than harsh punishment.
Estado de la práctica: tema archivado de un ciclo anterior del banco de preguntas. Sigue siendo útil para la práctica de habilidades, pero no se presenta como una pregunta de examen actual o garantizada. Cómo se etiquetan los temas.
Cómo responder Describe una nueva ley que te gustaría introducir en tu país Preguntas orales del IELTS
Para la tarjeta de referencia Describe una nueva ley que te gustaría introducir en tu país, utiliza el minuto de preparación para construir una ruta a través de la charla. Elija un tema claro, agregue dos momentos o detalles específicos y termine explicando por qué es importante. Luego utilice las preguntas vinculadas de la Parte 3 para practicar explicaciones y comparaciones más amplias.
Indicaciones de la tarjeta de referencia:
- que ley es
- Qué cambios trae esta ley
- Si esta nueva ley será popular
- ¿Cómo se te ocurrió la nueva ley?
- ¿Cómo te sientes acerca de esta nueva ley?
- Apertura: identificar a la persona, lugar, objeto o evento.
- Desarrollo: describir dos detalles o momentos en un orden lógico.
- Ampliación: explicar un motivo, resultado, comparación o problema.
- Reflexión: terminar con por qué el tema es memorable o importante.
Enfoque pregunta por pregunta
| pregunta de práctica | movimiento de respuesta útil |
|---|---|
| What rules should students follow at school? | Primero nombra el objeto y luego describe una característica o ejemplo específico. |
| Do people in your country usually obey the law? | Da una respuesta directa, una razón y un breve ejemplo sin memorizar un guión. |
| What kinds of behavior are considered as good behavior? | Primero nombra el objeto y luego describe una característica o ejemplo específico. |
| Do you think children can learn about the law outside of school? | Indique una opinión probable, explique el motivo y agregue una condición o ejemplo. |
Enfoque de vocabulario
El lenguaje útil ya demostrado en las respuestas modelo incluye punctuality, behaviour policy, ban phones, enforcement, social norms, compliance, civic-minded, empathy. Aprenda cada significado y una asociación natural de palabras, luego use el elemento en una respuesta nueva en lugar de copiar un guión completo.
Errores comunes a evitar
- Dar una respuesta memorizada que responda sólo parcialmente a la pregunta.
- Agregar vocabulario difícil sin verificar el significado o la colocación.
- Reiniciar después de cada error en lugar de corregir brevemente y continuar.
- Leer la respuesta modelo antes de grabar su primer intento.
Describa una nueva ley que le gustaría introducir en las preguntas frecuentes de su país.
¿Cómo debo utilizar el minuto de preparación de la tarjeta de referencia Describa una nueva ley que le gustaría introducir en su país?
Escribe palabras clave para una apertura, dos o tres detalles y una reflexión final. No intentes escribir oraciones completas.
¿Tengo que cubrir cada viñeta de la tarjeta de referencia?
Las indicaciones le ayudarán a organizar la charla. Cubrirlos es útil, pero una respuesta coherente de uno a dos minutos es más importante que marcar mecánicamente cada línea.
¿Cómo se conectan las preguntas de la Parte 3 con la Parte 2?
Desarrollan el mismo tema amplio a través de razones, comparaciones, efectos sociales o posibilidades futuras, por lo que las respuestas normalmente necesitan más explicaciones que la Parte 1.
