Карточка-подсказка, часть 2
Опишите новый закон, который вы хотели бы ввести в своей стране.
Вы должны сказать:
- Что это за закон
- Какие изменения несет этот закон
- Будет ли новый закон популярен
- Как вы придумали новый закон
- Как вы относитесь к этому новому закону
У вас будет одна-две минуты, чтобы поговорить на эту тему.
Часть 3. Вопросы для обсуждения
- What rules should students follow at school?
- Do people in your country usually obey the law?
- What kinds of behavior are considered as good behavior?
- Do you think children can learn about the law outside of school?
- What are the benefits for people to obey rules?
- How can parents teach children to obey rules?
Статус практики: Архивированная тема из предыдущего цикла банка вопросов. Он по-прежнему полезен для практики навыков, но не представлен в качестве текущего или гарантированного вопроса экзамена. Как помечаются темы.
Читать полную расшифровку
One law I would introduce is a statutory 'right to disconnect' that prevents employers from expecting employees to deal with non-urgent work communications outside their contracted hours. The law would require employers to set clear off-hours, refrain from sending routine emails or messages at night, and put emergency protocols in place so urgent matters can still be handled. This would bring real changes: better work–life balance, lower stress and clearer boundaries between home and work, and it would force firms to rethink rostering and communication practices. I suspect it would be popular among staff, particularly parents and carers, though some managers and small businesses might resist because they worry about losing flexibility. I arrived at the idea after years of getting late-night emails and seeing colleagues burn out; for instance, a friend missed her child's recital because she had to answer messages. I feel strongly that it would improve mental health and family life, and that clear legal rights would create fairer expectations. For example, France already has rules like this, and introducing penalties or an inspection regime would make the law meaningful rather than symbolic; employers might even be required to log communications to show compliance, which would be intrusive but increase accountability.
Прежде чем говорить, просмотрите тему
Используйте изображения в качестве подсказок идей. Опишите то, что вы заметили, свяжите это со своим опытом, а затем ответьте на реальный вопрос.
Типовые ответы, услышанные параллельно
Начните с более простого ответа, переключитесь на Band, чтобы услышать, как можно разработать ту же задачу, а затем запишите личный ответ. Это обучающие примеры, а не официальные ответы или гарантии баллов.
Часть 2. Типовой ответ
Part 2 cue-card response
I'd introduce a law called the 'right to disconnect'. It would stop employers asking staff to reply to work messages outside work hours. The change would give people better time with family and less stress. I think most workers would like it, though some bosses might not. I thought of it because I often get emails late and it feels like you never finish work. I feel it's fair and would help people's mental health, but it would need clear rules so employers can't ignore it.
One law I would introduce is a statutory 'right to disconnect' that prevents employers from expecting employees to deal with non-urgent work communications outside their contracted hours. The law would require employers to set clear off-hours, refrain from sending routine emails or messages at night, and put emergency protocols in place so urgent matters can still be handled. This would bring real changes: better work–life balance, lower stress and clearer boundaries between home and work, and it would force firms to rethink rostering and communication practices. I suspect it would be popular among staff, particularly parents and carers, though some managers and small businesses might resist because they worry about losing flexibility. I arrived at the idea after years of getting late-night emails and seeing colleagues burn out; for instance, a friend missed her child's recital because she had to answer messages. I feel strongly that it would improve mental health and family life, and that clear legal rights would create fairer expectations. For example, France already has rules like this, and introducing penalties or an inspection regime would make the law meaningful rather than symbolic; employers might even be required to log communications to show compliance, which would be intrusive but increase accountability.
Часть 3. Типовые ответы
What rules should students follow at school?
Students should follow basic rules like being on time, listening to teachers, doing homework and being polite to others. Schools often ask pupils to wear a uniform and not use phones in class. These rules help lessons run smoothly and keep everyone safe.
Schools should have clear, reasonable rules that encourage responsibility as well as respect: punctuality, attentiveness, honest work and consideration for others. Practical measures like banning phones during lessons, having a fair behaviour policy and teaching students how to resolve conflicts are useful. For example, a simple rule about lining up calmly prevents accidents at the dining hall and teaches order.
Do people in your country usually obey the law?
People in my country mostly obey the law, especially obvious things like traffic lights and paying taxes. But some people break rules if they think they won't get caught, such as parking illegally or speeding. It often depends on the person and the situation.
Overall people tend to obey laws that are visible and well‑enforced, like traffic regulations, but there is a grey area where social norms matter more than formal rules. Compliance varies with trust in institutions, the chance of being caught and cultural attitudes; for instance, minor offences such as littering or jaywalking are common if enforcement is lax. Effective policing and fair penalties usually increase obedience.
What kinds of behavior are considered as good behavior?
Good behaviour includes being polite, helping others, telling the truth and following rules. People also think giving up a seat for an older person or saying sorry are good actions. These things make society nicer.
Good behaviour covers respect, empathy and reliability: listening to others, keeping promises, showing courtesy in public and helping those in need. Small acts like giving up a bus seat, queuing properly or volunteering locally signal civic-minded behaviour. Such actions build trust and make daily life smoother for everyone.
Do you think children can learn about the law outside of school?
Yes. Children learn about rules from parents, TV and friends. They copy behaviour they see at home, and neighbours or community events can teach them about right and wrong too.
Definitely. Children absorb a lot outside school: parents, family routines and community groups are powerful teachers. Practical experiences — such as participating in local councils for young people, mock trials or community service — help them understand laws and consequences. Media and age-appropriate online resources can also explain rights and responsibilities in a relatable way.
What are the benefits for people to obey rules?
If people obey rules, life is safer and fairer. There are fewer accidents and less arguing. It also helps everyone know what to expect, so things run smoothly.
Obeying rules brings predictability and trust, which underpin social and economic life: roads are safer, public services work better and transactions require less policing. It also reduces costs associated with crime and conflict, and fosters a sense of fairness. For example, reliable adherence to traffic laws significantly cuts accidents and emergency costs.
How can parents teach children to obey rules?
Parents can teach rules by setting a good example, telling children the reasons for rules, and using routines and praise. Simple things like bedtime and chores teach discipline.
Parents teach rule-following best by modelling behaviour and by being consistent: explaining reasons, setting clear boundaries and enforcing fair consequences. Techniques like family meetings to agree household rules, chore charts, and natural consequences (for instance, if you miss a bus you learn punctuality the hard way) help children internalise norms. Positive reinforcement and explaining the wider purpose of rules are more effective than harsh punishment.
Статус практики: Архивированная тема из предыдущего цикла банка вопросов. Он по-прежнему полезен для практики навыков, но не представлен в качестве текущего или гарантированного вопроса экзамена. Как помечаются темы.
Как отвечать Опишите новый закон, который вы хотели бы ввести в своей стране. IELTS Устные вопросы.
Для карточки-подсказки «Опишите новый закон, который вы хотели бы ввести в своей стране», используйте минуту подготовки, чтобы построить маршрут выступления. Выберите четкую тему, добавьте два конкретных момента или детали и закончите рассказом, почему это важно. Затем используйте связанные вопросы Части 3, чтобы попрактиковаться в более широком объяснении и сравнении.
Подсказки на карточке:
- Что это за закон
- Какие изменения несет этот закон
- Будет ли новый закон популярен
- Как вы придумали новый закон
- Как вы относитесь к этому новому закону
- Открытие: идентифицируйте человека, место, предмет или событие.
- Развитие: опишите две детали или моменты в логическом порядке.
- Расширение: объясните причину, результат, сравнение или проблему.
- Для размышления: закончите рассказом о том, почему тема запомнилась или важна.
Повопросный подход
| Практический вопрос | Полезный ответный ход |
|---|---|
| What rules should students follow at school? | Сначала назовите вещь, затем опишите конкретную особенность или пример. |
| Do people in your country usually obey the law? | Дайте прямой ответ, одну причину и короткий пример, не заучивая сценарий. |
| What kinds of behavior are considered as good behavior? | Сначала назовите вещь, затем опишите конкретную особенность или пример. |
| Do you think children can learn about the law outside of school? | Выскажите вероятную точку зрения, объясните причину и добавьте одно условие или пример. |
Словарный фокус
Полезные формулировки, уже продемонстрированные в примерных ответах, включают: punctuality, behaviour policy, ban phones, enforcement, social norms, compliance, civic-minded, empathy. Изучите каждое значение и естественное сочетание слов, а затем используйте этот элемент в новом ответе вместо того, чтобы копировать полный сценарий.
Распространенные ошибки, которых следует избегать
- Дает заученный ответ, который лишь частично отвечает на вопрос.
- Добавление сложной лексики без проверки значения или словосочетания.
- Перезапуск после каждой ошибки вместо кратковременного исправления и продолжения.
- Чтение ответа модели перед записью своей первой попытки.
Опишите новый закон, который вы хотели бы ввести в практику вашей страны. Часто задаваемые вопросы.
Как мне следует использовать протокол «Опишите новый закон, который вы хотели бы ввести в своей стране»?
Напишите ключевые слова для начала, двух-трех деталей и финального размышления. Не пытайтесь писать полные предложения.
Должен ли я покрывать каждый пункт подсказки?
Подсказки помогут вам организовать беседу. Рассказывать о них полезно, но последовательный ответ в течение одной-двух минут важнее, чем механическая отметка каждой строки.
Как вопросы Части 3 связаны с Частью 2?
Они развивают одну и ту же широкую тему посредством причин, сравнений, социальных последствий или будущих возможностей, поэтому ответы обычно требуют большего объяснения, чем Часть 1.
